tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-456970430923597281.post1088491966298476415..comments2024-03-28T09:40:46.354-07:00Comments on The Earth and Man: Setting the Stage: The Bigotry of Radiative Transfer BelieversHarry Dale Huffmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03210275295826050501noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-456970430923597281.post-68460068563244464382017-09-22T15:45:33.100-07:002017-09-22T15:45:33.100-07:00Good Evening, Anonymous,
I have written about it...Good Evening, Anonymous,<br /><br /> I have written about it <a href="http://theendofthemystery.blogspot.com/2012/01/observation-on-unified-climate-theory.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>, <a href="http://theendofthemystery.blogspot.com/2012/01/second-response-to-unified-climate.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>, <a href="http://theendofthemystery.blogspot.com/2012/01/unified-climate-theory-iii.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>, and most recently <a href="https://theendofthemystery.blogspot.com/2016/09/nikolov-and-zeller-again.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.<br /><br />Most importantly, they talk of a mysterious "temperature enhancement" due to pressure, when the simple fact is, it is just the hydrostatic condition of the troposphere, which provides for the observed, constant vertical temperature lapse rate, which in turn controls the global mean temperature, at any pressure level including the planetary surface(sea level). There is no mystery, and the Standard Atmosphere has enshrined the simple physics of it for a century or more. My 2010 Venus/Earth comparison of course precisely confirmed the Standard Atmosphere as the true representative of the equilibrium state of the atmosphere, and its utter stability against either global warming OR cooling. The "Unified Climate Theory" of Nikolov and Zeller add nothing to this simple understanding, only more confusion to the unwary.Harry Dale Huffmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03210275295826050501noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-456970430923597281.post-87432621245475680952017-09-22T07:12:53.463-07:002017-09-22T07:12:53.463-07:00Surprised you're so dismissive of the Nikolov ...Surprised you're so dismissive of the Nikolov study Harry. If not identical to your Venus study then certainly very similar. <br />In your opinion what's wrong with it? <br />Regards <br />David Garner<br />garner_david@btconnect.comAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-456970430923597281.post-90760092075677577242017-07-12T11:27:49.543-07:002017-07-12T11:27:49.543-07:00Good Afternoon, Anonymous,
I think I will take yo...Good Afternoon, Anonymous,<br /><br />I think I will take your word that it is a terrible site, and not go there, and I encourage any readers here not to go there either. If anyone has doubts about their position and mine--differences or agreement between the two--they can write and ask me specific questions and I will answer them directly.Harry Dale Huffmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03210275295826050501noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-456970430923597281.post-30549776971935025882017-07-12T10:25:01.458-07:002017-07-12T10:25:01.458-07:00http://lidblog.com/atmospheric-pressure-greenhouse...http://lidblog.com/atmospheric-pressure-greenhouse-effect/<br /><br />Apologies for the terrible site. They appear to taking your position re pressure / distance from sun. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com