Thursday, March 14, 2019

Time Out: A Glitch, or Suppression? I Must Have Openness

When I first started to try to get public attention for my unprecedented scientific discovery, of what I have called the Great Design of the "gods", I knew its revolutionary uncovering of the single, objective origin of all the popularly-called ancient mysteries would be likely ignored by anyone in authority. I therefore (after a few attempts to engage with scientific journals, and individual scientists) decided to go straight to the people, even though that risked casting my pearls before swine, as it were (because this is THE greatest discovery in human history so far, and corrects human history, and human beliefs, at their very origin -- thus, religion as well as science, for example). Further, I deliberately set out to be ever open in my interactions.

With that in mind, this post differs from the main, scientific thrust of this blog; it addresses the current political situation, which I have pursued mostly by commenting on other sites, although I have been honest in mentioning the insane political situation here, insofar as I see it touching upon current science, or upon that origin of all things human I discovered.

I submitted the following comment to the Conservative Treehouse site. The submission went through (giving me the url just linked), but it did not appear. I tried to get it to appear by refreshing that page (at that specific link), and then by leaving and reacquiring the site, to no avail. I re-submitted the comment, and once again it went through and gave me a (new) url to my comment:

conservative treehouse

But, again, the comment didn't appear.

So, to be open, I post the comment here, in case deliberate human intervention stymied it on that site (I am making no attempt to provide context; those interested will understand what it is about, and others may take my word for it that the subject is a prime example of the ascendance of false dogma over honest reason, rampant in all of our institutions and in the world at large now, for which my discovery of the Great Design of the "gods" provides the original, ancient context -- new-old knowledge coming to light, at odds with all the false dogmas of history):

Nellie Ohr, 1) the wife of the 4th-ranking DOJ official, working for partisan, mercenary Fusion-GPS; and 2) her past connection with the CIA (and arch-villain John Brennan) -- This is precisely what I have been commenting on, especially the last few days, when people here were sounding so negative about "no criminal liability in a counterintelligence investigation" (absolute nonsense). To be specific:

"the CIA's fingerprints are all over this attempted coup d'etat in America. As I have tried to put it simply, it was and is a CIA 'In-Country Regime Change Operation' (enabled and guided by Obama, with his advisors, as the leader and universal enabler of it all). The CIA, in the person of violently pro-Obama, pro-Muslim John Brennan and the decrepit mind of James Clapper, provided the primary cover for everyone, assuring everyone that '17 intelligence agencies' had found that Russia had intervened in the 2016 election and also that Trump had colluded with Russia to falsely gain the Presidency. That was the 'insurance policy' all of the cabal members followed, when Trump won the Presidency."



"Any story about an actual Russian helping Steele needs above all to explain why they needed, and intensely used, Nellie Ohr, the universally recognized 'Russian expert' (and well-connected wife of Bruce Ohr, the FBI-Steele go-between, also intensely used), who could and most likely did write it herself (she not only had the requisite past education and experience, working with the CIA no less, but she was surely the 'sub-contractor' the FBI allowed to access, via illegal 'queries', raw 'un-FISAed' intelligence, to hopefully find bad things to use against presidential candidate Trump (from November 2015 to April 18, 2016, after which -- the very next day after, on April 19 -- they had to send Mary Jacoby, the wife of Fusion-GPS's Glenn Simpson, to visit the White House...immediately after that, the idea of the Steele dossier was born, to make a direct run on FISA and actual criminal, but totally fake, warrants)."



"The proper focus is, and always has been, to hack at the tap root, as it were: The intelligence cover-up, by Brennan, Clapper and Comey, that allows everyone to feign genuine dismay and anger, that 'Russia hacked the 2016 election and Trump colluded with them'. That cover-up was in play when Brennan briefed the Gang-of-8 (who made up that name? -- surely not one of The Insane Left), and was officially made public with the '17 intelligence agencies agree' report of January 2017. That is why the FISA 'queries' runaround, in which the FBI colluded with Fusion-GPS and its clearly corrupt employee Nellie Ohr (she, as the wife of DOJ bigwig Bruce Ohr, belongs in prison simply for working there, to dig up political dirt on Trump) is so central, so important: It predates the coverup, and shows obvious politically-motivated collusion between the FBI and the Democrat partisan intelligence mercenaries at Fusion-GPS."


I will take no political or ideological comments on this site. My intention is only to inform here.

Monday, March 4, 2019

Climate Alarmism Is But a Symptom of the Failed Uniformitarian Paradigm

I have submitted the following comment to the American Thinker site, in response to another commenter who averred that the climate change debate was politics, not science. My concern is with the science, so I responded:

It has been about politics, or political propaganda -- a Big Lie -- since 1988 or so, when it became a UN movement (to "redistribute wealth", as they have lately admitted) but before that, from about 1960, it was about the failure of climate science, which in turn was just the tip of the tail of the failure of the paradigm behind all of the earth (and life) sciences.

You see, the "greenhouse effect" originally came into science as a way to explain past "ice ages", which were themselves but a uniformitarian "explanation" for the patterns of geologic stratification, physical scratches, and erratic boulders found over the surface of the Earth. Carl Sagan championed the "greenhouse effect" in 1960 and after, and one of his students was James Hansen, who became the premier climate alarmist scientist of our time.

But back to the dog and its tail-tip. What we see now in the "debate" over "climate" (both of these are fake terms, as used in the political propaganda) is a replay of the debate in the latter 19th century, between Darwinian (undirected, uniformitarian) evolution and "Catastrophism", with the ironic twist that the followers of the uniformitarian paradigm -- the consensus, since Darwin -- are now the catastrophists, in positing a "global climate" that is balanced on a razor's edge (of "radiation forcings", one of which is the "greenhouse effect"), that is being knocked asunder by a change in atmospheric carbon dioxide from about .03% of the atmosphere to about .04% -- totally negligible.

The bottom line: First, "climate science" is a failed science; as I keep writing -- because I proved it, with my Venus/Earth temperatures comparison and merely solid, COMPETENT physical reasoning -- there IS no valid global climate science, and no competent climate scientists. Climate science needs to be taken from the climate scientists, because they have all been miseducated and have all failed. And that is irrespective of their subornation to an insane political narrative on the Left. But second, the paradigm of uniformitarian evolution of the physical Earth -- the extended Darwinian paradigm -- has failed, has in fact failed from its inception, despite its supposed support from Mendelian genetics, in the life sciences (there is no such, even seeming, support for it in the earth sciences -- only random cosmic accidents, "early on in the development of Earth" as the believers chant, to themselves as well as to every new student that comes to them). Genetics only lays bare the DESIGN of life, not its development -- the latter, comprising "evolution theory", is all made-up, unsupported, and even multiply disproved, speculation.

There is a crisis of incompetence throughout science today, because of the wrong turn made by Darwin and his followers more than a century and a half ago. And the bad science is just one part of the world-encompassing false dogmas, that have been too long nurtured by various groups, and cultures, that we are faced with today.

We are living in a climactic time, when many false dogmas are "coming home to roost" at the same time. Yes, like Islam, and every religion (and religiously-held ideas of every kind). It is a test, whether we have really grasped the Enlightenment that brought forth America (and the scientific revolution), or we will slip back into the easy dogmas of every past, ignorant people, going back to the very beginning of human intellectual endeavors.