The World is In the Hands of Children

I wrote the following article back in 2009, on newsblaze.com, as part of my initial foray into seeking recognition on the internet (going to the people directly, not to "peer review", which was and is a farce, as all entrenched institutions are, when it is time for them to hand over the reins of power to new knowledge). It is time to bring it forward again, because it is worthy of your kind (or even not so kind) attention, especially when you consider it was written off-the-cuff, and at the very outset of the current world insanity outbreak:

The mind of man wants to soar, to be as free as the wind that blows. Artists and creators of every kind, in all times, speak about the need to let their creativity "flow" like the wind, or a stream flowing without hindrance over the Earth. In Nature, if you try to block the "natural flow", the pressure builds up behind the block until you risk destruction of all that you have built on the other side of it; a poignant example of this is what happened to New Orleans -- below sea-level, and protected by levees -- during Hurricane Katrina: Washout City, literally.

In the 1630's, the mind of Galileo was blocked by the Church, as he sought to communicate a new knowledge of the world. He was eventually tried (by the Church, mind you, not a civil court), forced to recant his claim that the Earth moves around the Sun, and sentenced to house arrest for the remainder of his life. Does the phrase, "there's no law west of Dodge" ring a bell?

That's right; Galileo had ventured, as an innocent scientist seeking the truth, into a lawless frontier, full of bullying, sacrosanct ideas, and was simply shot down in the street, in a manner of speaking. Scientists ever afterward have celebrated him as one of the key figures, if not the very father, of modern science. And the war between science and religion, like the war between the sexes, is a perennial (and often laughable) spectacle to the innocent layperson, who is no expert and feels no real loyalty on either side.

Which brings us to myself. I am the Galileo of this age, and like him I am an independent scientist. Only today, the bullying authority that opposes and suppresses me is the scientific consensus itself, which the public largely accepts without question. Its sacrosanct idea is that there are only undirected physical forces behind all that we see, on the Earth and in the universe beyond, and that deliberate design of the world cannot be considered in science. As an innocent scientist, however (just like Galileo), I have found and verified just such a world design. (You can learn about it in my books, and in my blog, "Earth and Man: Setting the Stage.") It is a fact, which I cannot ignore, nor can I be silent about, for it goes to the very heart of an unrecognized crisis of competence in science today, a science that upholds naive myths of "plate tectonics", "ice ages", and other accoutrements of a supposed "evolution" of the Earth itself, from primitive ball of matter to "living world". The "explanations" of science today -- particularly, but not only, in the earth and life sciences -- are increasingly the stories of children, made to entertain children, and more darkly, to protect unquestioned and unsupported dogma.

You might think I would be protected (in this modern intellectual version of the Wild, Wild West) by the "creationists" and "intelligent design" claimants, since I'm talking about design of the natural world, but you would be wrong. The design I found is not the design of life, nor the one-time creation of the world, by a supreme God. What I have proven as fact -- and I know many think we can't speak of "proving" anything; but tell that to all the engineers and inventors who have built our modern world upon proven knowledge, or to physicists like myself whose professional business it is to prove what we say about the world -- what I have proven is a late and wholesale re-formation of the surface of the Earth (between 20,000 and 10,000 years ago), by those known to ancient man worldwide as the "gods" of myth and legend. The "gods", not God, once walked the Earth, and taught man all that he knew, thousands of years before the beginning of known human history. The debates of today over the origins of the Earth and the life on it are intellectual wars between the followers of the categorical Absolutes: God versus Chance. The reality is that, somewhere between creation of the material universe and the beginning of human history, a race of godlike men remade the surface of the Earth and the entire solar system, and imparted to it all a complex design intended to communicate a coherent message to man on Earth. That complex message became the early religious belief of mankind, the progenitor of every field of human thought. But it was passed down by a mankind in childhood, in fragments descriptive of the images wrought in the design and imbedded -- in disguise, as fantastic characters, objects and lands -- within the exciting stories known today as myths.

But what does this all mean for us today? It means, first of all, that the science programs you see on TV about the origin of the Earth and the life on it, are modern myths. The Earth did not evolve, mindlessly -- it was made, as deliberately and as precisely as Walt Disney World was made. The "expert" scientists you see on these programs have themselves been educated in myth, masquerading as science: the myth that the relatively weak and undirected geological processes of the last 10,000 years, if given four and a half billion years to work, and aided by the occasional "killer" asteroid impact or other catastrophe from space, and any required number of other convenient cosmic accidents (the list keeps growing), can account for the creation of the Earth as we know it. These are bedtime stories -- or "Ask Mr. Wizard" Saturday morning fare -- and the scientists who tell them are inept at best.

Religion too, worldwide, has been the victim of the misplaced concreteness of ancient myths, in which mere likeness of an image to something both familiar yet fantastic was taken by man to be a sacred assurance of the existence of that fantastic thing. Thus, the outline of Africa on the globe looks like a man's face in profile, only with a horn growing out of his forehead; and thus it was that the "Horned One" was born, in all his mythical guises, whether as the Devil or as the god Thor, who once got a "hone" imbedded in his forehead in a fight with a giant, or any number of other mythical horned characters. Modern scientists don't want to hear that Africa looks like a horned man, but it does. They don't want to admit there was intent behind it, but there was. This and a thousand other evidences of design of the world they absolutely refuse to countenance as scientific evidence, because they don't know the overall design into which they all fit. They are children, you see, easily tired out by a world more complex than they are prepared to acknowledge, a world which contains things far beyond the bounds of their childish theories.

Put this knowledge alongside the childishness you have witnessed in recent years in our political and financial systems, and there is only one conclusion: The world is in the hands of children.

The Current Insanity and the Next World Paradigm

I have submitted the following comment to the American Thinker site, to an article on "America's detour from sanity":

The insanity has many roots, with origins at different times. I have understood, and been trying to inform others, that the Democrats have fully become "The Insane Left" (my term), prosecuting "The War of the Insane Left", only (!) since the election of Obama/Soetoro -- the "First Fake President" (more than, for example, the more widely proclaimed "First Black President") -- in 2008. The roots go back long before Obama, but the insanity flowered, full bloom or across the board, then, and has only gotten worse since (as the noxious plant, or cancer, has of course clashed with reality at every point, and thus defended itself ever more determinedly, obsessively, deludedly).

The point of the insanity spear has been the Muslim subornation of the so-called black "civil rights" movement, which goes back to 1930 and the creation of the Black Muslims (now largely Louis Farrakhan's Nation of Islam, based upon notions of black supremacy and black separatism). But that is only on the political side; the full picture of the current degeneration covers also all of the sciences (!) and religions.

The Enlightenment, or Age of Reason, of the mid-18th century, that brought forth the United States of America, was a tremendous opportunity for religions to shed their worst habits, of physical coercion (promulgating materialistic superstitions and physically forcing sectarian, essentially tribal, belief) in the name of God. And it was most telling that Spiritualism, the simple belief in the fundamental truth of the spiritual nature of Man, over his temporal, physical existence, bloomed in the 19th century (even in Muslim countries, the gentle Bahai faith was born, only to be fiercely rejected by the tyrannical Islam of the execrable Mohammed and his rabid followers).

But the Enlightenment was stymied, on many levels, by the materialistic pseudo-science of Charles Darwin, known as undirected evolution of everything in the world -- and the world itself, even though on that world level there was no "natural selection" the evolutionists could use as an excuse for their wrong-headed belief, only "cosmic accidents", always, strangely, early after the world's initial creation "4 or 5 billion years ago".

The sciences went wrong with undirected evolution theory, and increasingly so as their faith (!) in it made it, in their minds, fact not theory (much less the utterly false theory that it actually is). The "consensus" was born, but with a critical error at its very foundation that would insure that, eventually, the entire edifice of theories, supposed "knowledge" based upon that already broken foundation, would crumble en masse, all together. In our time, more or less (I already know it; it will become common knowledge, the hard way, to the next generations).

Religions were originally founded upon belief in the "gods" of earliest world myths, and in their supposed coercion of man. The all-powerful and capricious gods. "Might is right" was drummed into mankind, worldwide, by that belief. Which is not to say the gods were evil, no; they were all-beneficent, as Nature itself is beneficent to the needs of man, in food, in company, in problems and ever-larger "mysteries" to solve with civilization the prize. And in natural beauty, of the earth, of living things, of the human form itself (particularly the female).

In the 2nd and 1st millennia BC, the power of the gods increasingly gave way to true morality and sense of justice, based fundamentally (as the American founding fathers understood) on the inalienable rights of every individual person. Religion became less tyrannical and more reassuring -- but the millennia old superstitions still clung, and coerced wherever they could. Jesus the Christ was clearly meant to cut the cord between the old coercive, tyrannical powers over man, and replace them with the truth of man's real nature, and God's real nature. And he succeeded enough to make Christianity, however imperfectly developed and practiced by his followers AD, the premier religion of that AD (and we know it was greatly imperfect -- the Protestant Reformation, and multiplication of diverse "Christian" sects, clearly shows that). But he failed to entirely remove the old coercion (of the "gods", recast as God, as in "Fear the Lord thy God").

Religion and science alike goofed, big time, in thinking God is coercive, and His believers are entitled to be coercive in His Name. The truth is that the world is DESIGNED, and it is the design that is coercive (with snakes and mosquitos and viruses and whatnot, and rain only in its time, not in man's desire for it, or for the lack of a surfeit of it...et cetera, in too many ways to count the physical world's abridgements of our tender sensibilities..."poor, poor, pitiful we; poor poor pitiful we" (sung to the tune of "Poor, Poor Pitiful Me")

I am here to inform of the results of my scientific research, into the objective origin of all the "Ancient Mysteries" you see slobbered over (ahem, I mean speculated shamelessly upon) by others on TV, and in books, over the last half-century and more. Essentially, that the world (and us) is designed, and my research has uncovered that precisely-constructed design, as no one before has even imagined. It was designed not by God, but by the "gods", who were, in consequence, REAL -- and of course, extraterrestrial, as the design encompasses the whole solar system.

That, in a nutshell, is the next scientific and religious paradigm, that must be learned and understood generally (that is to say, by everyone) in order to fix all that we see going wrong now (and over the last, oh, 200 years, or 4,000, or 20,000 years or so).

This just happens to be a climactic time. Will Mankind learn better, or cling to its already too-long-nurtured false dogmas? The answer, as always, is it will do both; the longer it takes, the harder will be the lesson.

Man, God, and the "gods"

I have posted the following comment to an American Thinker article on "Being Human and the Abuse of Science", which sets belief in God above science:

The problem is, all of our religions grew out of previous history, which personalized God, and thus put God in a too-small box of man's own making. The most obvious problem with this, of course, is the proliferation of man-made "Gods", which led to competing religions -- a division of mankind that has yet to be healed by new understanding, rather than kept alive by man-made, false dogmas masquerading as the truth, as "revealed" through various "prophets". Mohammed and Islam is an extreme example.

God, in purest truth, is overarching meaning; meaningfulness itself. Of course, to personalize that: God is the Designer of all that exists in the material world, the material universe.

But there is new, more immediate knowledge now. Not about the truth of God, but about the "gods" of ancient myth. Those who are blind to the underlying order and coherence in the physical world, and the indicated overarching meaning, are second or third rate thinkers, blind to the uncounted wonders (not mere scientific observance and dispassionate listing of the details) of the world and man.

Human religions, despite human learning throughout history and such fundamental advances as monotheism, have all been suborned from the beginning, by the once-sacred stories passed down about the "gods", now relegated to "myth", or primitive fantasy. But in fact -- as many have wondered but only I have uncovered and verified, scientifically, by my discovery of the "Great Design of the 'gods' " -- the "gods" did exist. For their "Great Design" IS great, encompassing the entire world, and unavoidably indicating that ALL was designed -- as we can note in even the smallest of things, all around us -- and appreciation of the design of all things is key to appreciation of the truth of an overarching meaning, and thus intelligence, known as God. They were the ones who taught Man to fear them and thus to "fear God", and the ones who divided Man into separate tribes, with false dogmas that still rule us in too many ways.

This is not wild, or merely hopeful, speculation. Through my discovery of the Great Design of the 'gods', it is now fact, constituting a new paradigm for both human science and religion. And the breakdown of order, and the rise of old, false dogmas, that we are seeing today is but an indication that this new knowledge is needed now.

Alienation, Meaning, and False Dogma

I have submitted the following comment to the fabius maximus site, in response to an article on alienation:

Large-scale, or mass, alienation is due to a general incompetence on the part of the "experts", particularly in science and religion. Or to make a long story short, too long nurturing of false dogmas in the underlying assumptions of a civilization or society. The primary false dogma of modern times is the establishment of Darwinian, or undirected "evolution" as the paradigm for all scientific observation and explanation of all that we observe, without thought for the essential meaninglessness behind that assumption.

This works on the individual level too, because the individual's mind is the very unit of intelligence, which absolutely requires meaning, or more fundamentally, meaningfulness of all that is in our lives, all of the physical universe particularly (which feeds our senses).

In my book, "The End of the Mystery", I identified what I have learned through my research and lifetime of experience as the natural philosophy of Man: "I think, therefore God exists." "God", in turn, is identifiable as the meaningfulness behind all things. Our own, slightest rational thought presupposes such overarching meaningfulness; without it, our thoughts must fall apart -- hence, alienation, from ourselves and from the meaningful world.

Alienation is the individual's natural response to an assumed meaninglessness, to which the meaningfulness of our own thoughts give the lie, always and ever. The answer is, and has always been, to realize once and for all that the world and everything in it is meaningful, both in itself and in its connections to all else. Which is not to pretend that any human being knows all of those meanings, or the overarching meaning of it all. Just that logic itself tells us, or should if we are intellectually competent or wise, that the meaningfulness of all is real, and independent of our limited understanding.

I have probably said, "protested", too much...but such is life; I have said it, I take responsibility for it, I proclaim it to the world. Go forth, and multiply the understanding

As if that weren't already a lot to think about, I added separately:

The growing trouble with multiculturalism should also be mentioned. You can see how that is going, with the Western embrace of Islam and the bringing together of cultures that don't WANT to come together, but to cling each to their own culture as superior, despite evidence to the contrary. Our societies are not judging the long-held dogmas of each culture competently -- it's kind of like introducing a new predator into one's biosystem, without regard for its predatory nature. Really stupid, and the scientists have been guilty of that themselves, in their trying to improve on the established systems of the natural world while not understanding those systems well at all.

The Dark Side of Science And Religion

I have posted the following comment to an American Thinker article on "The Dark Side of Science":

Both science and religion -- as practiced by human beings, who are ignorant of far more than they are knowing -- may be classified as "fake news" (to take advantage of a current idea): Science as practiced is not necessarily good reasoning, and religion as practiced is not necessarily good in spirit (or "spiritual"). Both are, more often than not, not what they are supposed, or meant, to be.

Good reason and spirituality are the objects to be desired; science and religion are at best tools to those ends, and mankind has seen enough value in both to have made them institutions, necessary for civilization -- but also capable of holding mankind back (as religion has repeatedly done throughout history, and science is increasingly doing, for the last century and a half, with the rise, and current general belief, in scientific materialism, most famously represented by Darwinism, or undirected evolution of the world and all of its life).

The key, of course, is learning, and the institutions of both science and religion are -- at least, they are meant to be -- institutions of learning.

We are not here to love one another, for example, because we make ourselves unlovable, in our selfish ignorance; we are here to LEARN to love one another; we can argue over just how great a majority -- if not all -- of us NEVER learn it very well. It helps (immensely) if we are taught the lesson by example from earliest childhood, and consistently until we grow up to reason for ourselves. Religion CAN help provide that, but the chain is only as strong as its weakest link, and if that weakest link is our parents who teach us, or the morally weak (or even false) religion they practice, we grow up mentally deficient, relative to those of us who were taught better.

There is new knowledge that mankind needs to learn, which would correct fundamental ignorance in both science and religion. The "experts" -- so-called -- in both fields don't want to hear of it (nor do their followers, the unquestioning believers in the consensus, in either field). It will replace the currently ruling paradigms in both science and religion.

Here is a gentle example of what the new knowledge can provide:

advice to a truthseeker

More Than a Conspiracy, More Than Climate Science

The Notrickszone site has a post on universities suppressing non-consensus climate views. One commenter derided the post as a "conspiracy" view, while another, on the other side of the climate debate, looked back to the 1950s, when, he wrote, continental drift was suppressed. My response to both sides:

Continental drift was not suppressed, just strongly argued against, because geophysicists (not geologists, but physicists) could find no reasonable physical cause for it. And no one has ever actually found the internal magma currents supposedly driving continental drift, nor have they ever found subduction actually taking place anywhere; the physics of the crustal materials involved still denies it CAN take place (i.e., lighter material diving into and below the denser material beneath it), much less that it HAS happened, or IS happening.

The truth is that it is not just climate science that fails today; all of the earth AND life sciences are in a yet-unrecognized crisis of incompetent theories, going all the way back to the rise (and consensus agreement that it was "settled science") of uniformitarianism and its most famous offspring, Darwinian (i.e., undirected) evolution.

See, for example:

The True Origin of Continental Drift

and

Challenge to Earth Scientists

So it is not a matter of just a "climate conspiracy" having taken over all of our most trusted and authoritative institutions; it is the culmination of a long-nurtured, dogmatic denial of deliberate design of our world, which has affected all of the earth and life sciences. I am the only scientist who can speak authoritatively about this, because I am the one who has uncovered and verified the re-formation and design that was imposed upon the Earth, and the entire solar system, by those who were called gods by ancient man. It was that deliberate re-formation that moved and shaped the continents, not plate tectonics. That is the FACT that no other scientific "expert" in the world will face today; too many theories, too many lifetimes of diligent but misdirected research, are at stake. The sacrosanct uniformitarian paradigm, the "undirected evolution" paradigm, is at stake. Against that, those who seek refuge in their political ideology--as if the debate were only between the enlightened Left and the reactionary Right--are the most deluded, the most misdirected in their thinking, and the most irrelevant and incompetent. But make no mistake, ALL are incompetent today, in the face of the great design I found to be the single source of all the ancient mysteries.

Dealing With Criminal Authorities

Steven Goddard has come to the conclusion that the climate "debate" is no longer about science, and wonders how to deal with "criminals". My response:

You do what I have been doing for the last 3 years, ever since I definitively disproved the "greenhouse effect" with my Venus/Earth temperatures comparison (the scientific debate has been over ever since): You identify the Insane Left (and the subornation of all of our authoritative institutions by it) as the immediate problem--substituting as it does a political ideology, and outright tyranny, for science--and the underlying problem, that of a general incompetence among scientists, for letting climate science go so far wrong as to forget the Standard Atmosphere and the stable vertical temperature lapse rate structure of the troposphere. Beyond that, I can only recommend mass civil disobedience of any and all laws passed during the Obama years, particularly Obamacare and the anti-scientific EPA regulations (like officially denoting CO2 an "air pollutant", and thus subject to strict regulation under the Clean Air Act).

And you should prepare yourself mentally for increasing forays into governmental tyranny over individuals' rights--as more and more citizens fail financially--and for actual war (although that is most likely to occur when most of the Baby Boomers are dead).

When my greater discoveries are finally confronted and generally accepted, then our divisions will recede, people will start to really work together in a newly vibrant society, and real progress can be made, in science, religion and modern societies. For now, reason is taking a back seat to tribalism and past historical injustices, both real and imagined, and the world is pushing for war thereby.