The Present War and the Needed New Knowledge

I have submitted the following comment to the American Thinker site, in response to an article about the state of political war that now exists in America and the world (as I have stated before, I will take no political or ideological comments on this science site):

If money is the lifeblood of the Insane Left (as I call them, since Obama brought carefully concealed ideas of Black and Muslim supremacy, not to mention Malthusian environmental and climate hysteria, into political correctness), then the "body" through which that "blood" flows is an artificial one, a golem or zombie (to use a perversely popular movie nightmare character, over the last 50 years -- perhaps not coincidentally, the same time frame as the post-civil-rights "racist white America" movement, of law-bending and increasing outright lawlessness -- a la Kim Foxx now -- in the name of "affirmative action"). It is without true, moral character (Obama's own defining characteristic, which he shares with the Black Muslims -- who are Black Supremacists, the antithesis of White Supremacists, as taught to them by Muslims -- and the Muslims themselves).

Islam, the Muslim religion, has been around almost as long as Christianity on the world stage, and is directly opposed to Christianity, since its first campaign of conquest invaded Spain. We are dealing with a long-standing, religious enmity, grafted onto, or more correctly suborning, modern "social justice", or black (and increasingly, latino) separatism and favored status.

It has been an open war, The War of the Insane Left, since Obama was made President in 2008. It has mostly been a political war, but with actual violence done by individual believers in the cult (I'm referring to Antifa and Black Lives Matter, law-hating young men/women like Trayvon Martin, rather than actual Islamic terrorists), now openly pushed and prodded by the likes of Ilhan Omar and AOC, the latest "false prophets" in a four thousand year history of false prophets. Religion itself is failing, now, not just politics and science.

"Who knows only his own generation [and thus only his own grievances, however hard] remains always a child." That is what the world is faced with now -- the avoidance behavior of a world full of children, against all the painfully learned truths of history. As a hard scientist, with no ties to academia and the consensus for the past 25 years, I have made a great discovery, that would act to shine the light on that history, all the way back to its heretofore darkest beginnings -- but the children of today need to tear themselves away from all past grievances, to LOOK at that newly lighted, long, long path of mankind, to LOOK at its real, objective origin as never known before.

The world is full of voices, all crying out "listen to ME!" All I can do, as The Voice among voices, needed to draw mankind back from the brink perhaps as never before, is inform of the existence of new yet oldest truth, about the world and the mankind irrevocably bound to it. I do not hold myself as wiser than you -- but I do know much more, about what this world of man needs now.

Time Out: A Glitch, or Suppression? I Must Have Openness

When I first started to try to get public attention for my unprecedented scientific discovery, of what I have called the Great Design of the "gods", I knew its revolutionary uncovering of the single, objective origin of all the popularly-called ancient mysteries would be likely ignored by anyone in authority. I therefore (after a few attempts to engage with scientific journals, and individual scientists) decided to go straight to the people, even though that risked casting my pearls before swine, as it were (because this is THE greatest discovery in human history so far, and corrects human history, and human beliefs, at their very origin -- thus, religion as well as science, for example). Further, I deliberately set out to be ever open in my interactions.

With that in mind, this post differs from the main, scientific thrust of this blog; it addresses the current political situation, which I have pursued mostly by commenting on other sites, although I have been honest in mentioning the insane political situation here, insofar as I see it touching upon current science, or upon that origin of all things human I discovered.

I submitted the following comment to the Conservative Treehouse site. The submission went through (giving me the url just linked), but it did not appear. I tried to get it to appear by refreshing that page (at that specific link), and then by leaving and reacquiring the site, to no avail. I re-submitted the comment, and once again it went through and gave me a (new) url to my comment:

conservative treehouse

But, again, the comment didn't appear.

So, to be open, I post the comment here, in case deliberate human intervention stymied it on that site (I am making no attempt to provide context; those interested will understand what it is about, and others may take my word for it that the subject is a prime example of the ascendance of false dogma over honest reason, rampant in all of our institutions and in the world at large now, for which my discovery of the Great Design of the "gods" provides the original, ancient context -- new-old knowledge coming to light, at odds with all the false dogmas of history):

Nellie Ohr, 1) the wife of the 4th-ranking DOJ official, working for partisan, mercenary Fusion-GPS; and 2) her past connection with the CIA (and arch-villain John Brennan) -- This is precisely what I have been commenting on, especially the last few days, when people here were sounding so negative about "no criminal liability in a counterintelligence investigation" (absolute nonsense). To be specific:

"the CIA's fingerprints are all over this attempted coup d'etat in America. As I have tried to put it simply, it was and is a CIA 'In-Country Regime Change Operation' (enabled and guided by Obama, with his advisors, as the leader and universal enabler of it all). The CIA, in the person of violently pro-Obama, pro-Muslim John Brennan and the decrepit mind of James Clapper, provided the primary cover for everyone, assuring everyone that '17 intelligence agencies' had found that Russia had intervened in the 2016 election and also that Trump had colluded with Russia to falsely gain the Presidency. That was the 'insurance policy' all of the cabal members followed, when Trump won the Presidency."

link

-------------------------

"Any story about an actual Russian helping Steele needs above all to explain why they needed, and intensely used, Nellie Ohr, the universally recognized 'Russian expert' (and well-connected wife of Bruce Ohr, the FBI-Steele go-between, also intensely used), who could and most likely did write it herself (she not only had the requisite past education and experience, working with the CIA no less, but she was surely the 'sub-contractor' the FBI allowed to access, via illegal 'queries', raw 'un-FISAed' intelligence, to hopefully find bad things to use against presidential candidate Trump (from November 2015 to April 18, 2016, after which -- the very next day after, on April 19 -- they had to send Mary Jacoby, the wife of Fusion-GPS's Glenn Simpson, to visit the White House...immediately after that, the idea of the Steele dossier was born, to make a direct run on FISA and actual criminal, but totally fake, warrants)."

link

-------------------------

"The proper focus is, and always has been, to hack at the tap root, as it were: The intelligence cover-up, by Brennan, Clapper and Comey, that allows everyone to feign genuine dismay and anger, that 'Russia hacked the 2016 election and Trump colluded with them'. That cover-up was in play when Brennan briefed the Gang-of-8 (who made up that name? -- surely not one of The Insane Left), and was officially made public with the '17 intelligence agencies agree' report of January 2017. That is why the FISA 'queries' runaround, in which the FBI colluded with Fusion-GPS and its clearly corrupt employee Nellie Ohr (she, as the wife of DOJ bigwig Bruce Ohr, belongs in prison simply for working there, to dig up political dirt on Trump) is so central, so important: It predates the coverup, and shows obvious politically-motivated collusion between the FBI and the Democrat partisan intelligence mercenaries at Fusion-GPS."

link

I will take no political or ideological comments on this site. My intention is only to inform here.

Climate Alarmism Is But a Symptom of the Failed Uniformitarian Paradigm

I have submitted the following comment to the American Thinker site, in response to another commenter who averred that the climate change debate was politics, not science. My concern is with the science, so I responded:

It has been about politics, or political propaganda -- a Big Lie -- since 1988 or so, when it became a UN movement (to "redistribute wealth", as they have lately admitted) but before that, from about 1960, it was about the failure of climate science, which in turn was just the tip of the tail of the failure of the paradigm behind all of the earth (and life) sciences.

You see, the "greenhouse effect" originally came into science as a way to explain past "ice ages", which were themselves but a uniformitarian "explanation" for the patterns of geologic stratification, physical scratches, and erratic boulders found over the surface of the Earth. Carl Sagan championed the "greenhouse effect" in 1960 and after, and one of his students was James Hansen, who became the premier climate alarmist scientist of our time.

But back to the dog and its tail-tip. What we see now in the "debate" over "climate" (both of these are fake terms, as used in the political propaganda) is a replay of the debate in the latter 19th century, between Darwinian (undirected, uniformitarian) evolution and "Catastrophism", with the ironic twist that the followers of the uniformitarian paradigm -- the consensus, since Darwin -- are now the catastrophists, in positing a "global climate" that is balanced on a razor's edge (of "radiation forcings", one of which is the "greenhouse effect"), that is being knocked asunder by a change in atmospheric carbon dioxide from about .03% of the atmosphere to about .04% -- totally negligible.

The bottom line: First, "climate science" is a failed science; as I keep writing -- because I proved it, with my Venus/Earth temperatures comparison and merely solid, COMPETENT physical reasoning -- there IS no valid global climate science, and no competent climate scientists. Climate science needs to be taken from the climate scientists, because they have all been miseducated and have all failed. And that is irrespective of their subornation to an insane political narrative on the Left. But second, the paradigm of uniformitarian evolution of the physical Earth -- the extended Darwinian paradigm -- has failed, has in fact failed from its inception, despite its supposed support from Mendelian genetics, in the life sciences (there is no such, even seeming, support for it in the earth sciences -- only random cosmic accidents, "early on in the development of Earth" as the believers chant, to themselves as well as to every new student that comes to them). Genetics only lays bare the DESIGN of life, not its development -- the latter, comprising "evolution theory", is all made-up, unsupported, and even multiply disproved, speculation.

There is a crisis of incompetence throughout science today, because of the wrong turn made by Darwin and his followers more than a century and a half ago. And the bad science is just one part of the world-encompassing false dogmas, that have been too long nurtured by various groups, and cultures, that we are faced with today.

We are living in a climactic time, when many false dogmas are "coming home to roost" at the same time. Yes, like Islam, and every religion (and religiously-held ideas of every kind). It is a test, whether we have really grasped the Enlightenment that brought forth America (and the scientific revolution), or we will slip back into the easy dogmas of every past, ignorant people, going back to the very beginning of human intellectual endeavors.

Fight False Dogma With New Knowledge About Its True Origin

I have posted the following comment to an article on the Conservative Treehouse site, in response to another comment about Islam, and its incorrect, and entirely wrong-headed, description as "the religion of peace". I post it here only because the new/old science I have uncovered, and which will be the next paradigm in both science and religion, is particularly and critically needed now:

We are living in a climactic (or near-climactic) time of wars, not just between men but between competing, long-held dogmas (as opposed to competent reason and honest, rational disagreements). What you have written is obvious to me, but I have noticed that one can tell the dogmas ruling a person or group by their refusal to see the obvious. Adherence to one's favorite false dogmas is ascendant now over good, honest reason; this has been a constant refrain of mine, since the ascendance of Obama/Soetoro, the First Fake President.

It is the false dogmas themselves -- yes, like Islam, or Mohammedanism -- which have been too long nurtured, that must be destroyed, not just the jihadist -- i.e., activist, radical -- individuals who follow them, to mass destruction on all sides.

"Islam", in particular, literally means "I-Salam", or "No Peace". That translation (made by me alone, based upon revolutionary research), in the context of what we all know about the entire history of Mohammedanism/Islam, is instantly confirmed.

It's going to take a general abandonment of too-long held false dogmas, to solve the mess of our time. And that will take both a moral re-enlightenment, and the new knowledge I have uncovered, about the origin of the oldest false dogmas.

Climate According to Weathermen

I don't feel there is anything of scientific value (other than as illustration of scientific incompetence of the "experts", and mass delusion on the part of the public) in the ongoing political climate debates, but in the interest of informing the many who still do not understand the most basic underpinnings of the debate (or war), I have made the following response, on the American Thinker site, to an article on statements about climate change made by TV weatherman Al Roker:

Roker is a purveyor of weather on TV, a performer and entertainer. A weather propagandist, if you will. He is like the weathermen on the Weather Channel, who you can watch present the weather -- around the nation, and even around the world -- in a hyped, overwrought or biasedly enthusiastic manner, ever hour of every day.

If you want to have a serious discussion of climate, climate change, or global warming, start with this: Weather changes, all the time. Climate does not, and global climate -- as represented by the only measurement of it that scientists have, or communicate, the global mean surface temperature -- changes least of all. "Global climate" does not change at all; the global temperature record(s) that purport to show that it does change have all been shown to be inadequate at best and fraudulent at worst. See, for example:

US Temperatures Have Been Fraudulently Adjusted

Weathermen, and climate scientists as well, think they can predict the climate by following the weather, for they have been mis-educated to think, simplistically, that "climate is just the long-term average of weather". As silly as it may sound to anyone with common sense, climate models are an attempt to predict climate change by using weather models, simplistically extrapolated far beyond their effective range in time and space.

The reality is that climate is the unchanging stage, while weather is the coming and going of transient players upon the stage. This is approximately so even for regional or local climates, and it is rigorously so for the global climate, or global mean surface temperature. I have written of this many times, for example:

True Situation in Climate Science

Just remember: Weather does not affect the climate; rather climate -- the stage upon which weather plays its transient parts -- constrains the weather, within a fundamentally unchanging environment globally.

The Rise of Unthinking False Dogma in American Science

I have submitted the following comment to the American Thinker site, in response to an article about the degeneration of Scientific American magazine into a kind of "church organ" of materialistic science and, now, the Insane Left brought to political correctness by Barack Obama. I am of course most mindful of the sorry state of science today, not the political dissolution:

First there was Charles Darwin, who doubted his God and concocted a bootstrap physical world, suspended by its own magical "evolution" apart from any meaning to it all. Then there was Secular Humanism, an overextension of the Enlightenment that made Man -- and his unplumbed origin and plethora of mental eccentricities -- the measure of all.

For a long time, the AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science) was the standard-bearer for the denial of design in the world and what it implies -- scientifically, but they can't stand that, and so redefine science to keep it out -- about a higher reality than the merely physical. For a long time, it has been an increasingly unbending promulgation of undirected evolution, that has been for several generations now only empty dogma/propaganda.

When Scientific American caught the disease, and began to morph into a full-on organ of the Church of Evolution and the Scientific Consensus, also known as the "The Science Is Settled" cult sect, it quickly lost all credibility with real scientists, who do not worship any theory (like Evolution), but only seek the light of the truth, however hard and long is the road to it.

See for example:

Once and Future Paradigm is back

and

Design vs. Contrivance

A new world order, a new scientific and religious paradigm, is here. And the current consensus knows nothing of it, and won't stoop to look at it.

Man, God, and the "gods"

I have posted the following comment to an American Thinker article on "Being Human and the Abuse of Science", which sets belief in God above science:

The problem is, all of our religions grew out of previous history, which personalized God, and thus put God in a too-small box of man's own making. The most obvious problem with this, of course, is the proliferation of man-made "Gods", which led to competing religions -- a division of mankind that has yet to be healed by new understanding, rather than kept alive by man-made, false dogmas masquerading as the truth, as "revealed" through various "prophets". Mohammed and Islam is an extreme example.

God, in purest truth, is overarching meaning; meaningfulness itself. Of course, to personalize that: God is the Designer of all that exists in the material world, the material universe.

But there is new, more immediate knowledge now. Not about the truth of God, but about the "gods" of ancient myth. Those who are blind to the underlying order and coherence in the physical world, and the indicated overarching meaning, are second or third rate thinkers, blind to the uncounted wonders (not mere scientific observance and dispassionate listing of the details) of the world and man.

Human religions, despite human learning throughout history and such fundamental advances as monotheism, have all been suborned from the beginning, by the once-sacred stories passed down about the "gods", now relegated to "myth", or primitive fantasy. But in fact -- as many have wondered but only I have uncovered and verified, scientifically, by my discovery of the "Great Design of the 'gods' " -- the "gods" did exist. For their "Great Design" IS great, encompassing the entire world, and unavoidably indicating that ALL was designed -- as we can note in even the smallest of things, all around us -- and appreciation of the design of all things is key to appreciation of the truth of an overarching meaning, and thus intelligence, known as God. They were the ones who taught Man to fear them and thus to "fear God", and the ones who divided Man into separate tribes, with false dogmas that still rule us in too many ways.

This is not wild, or merely hopeful, speculation. Through my discovery of the Great Design of the 'gods', it is now fact, constituting a new paradigm for both human science and religion. And the breakdown of order, and the rise of old, false dogmas, that we are seeing today is but an indication that this new knowledge is needed now.